Subject to certain exceptions, where a shareholder (other than a corporation resident in Canada) of a corporation is indebted to the corporation (a “Shareholder Loan”), the shareholder is deemed by subsection 80.4(2) to receive an interest benefit to the extent that the notional interest on the Shareholder Loan, calculated at the prescribed rate, exceeds the interest actually owing and paid. However, for a Shareholder Loan that was included in computing the income of a person under Part I of the Income Tax Act (for example under subsection 15(2)), paragraph 80.4(3)(b) provides that no subsection 80.4(2) interest benefit is … Continue Reading
ITA regulation 102 requires employers to withhold tax on remuneration paid to non-resident employees who are employed in Canada. This requirement can be avoided by seeking a treaty-based waiver (regulation 102 waiver) or certification as a qualifying non-resident employer. However, often there is not sufficient time to do this before the employment is to begin, or there is a lack of awareness of the rules. Where the employer must withhold tax, should the amount be based on the non-resident employee’s Canadian income or worldwide income? Clarification from the CRA would be appreciated.
Specifically, regulation 102 imposes withholding on “any payment … Continue Reading
Canadian federal income tax law provides numerous benefits to companies that engage in an “active business”. Whether a particular endeavour undertaken is an “active business” is, of course, a question of fact and depends on individual circumstances. Some scenarios are clearly those of an “active business”, such as the case of manufacturing and production, retail, mining, sales and shipping and receiving. Others are clearly more of a passive nature, such as merely owning real estate and collecting rent on the property, without any substantive management. Many could be considered somewhere in between.
When a company is in fact engaged in … Continue Reading
Canada continues to be an attractive market for private equity (“PE“) investors with recent transactions highlighting significant investments into Canadian real estate and energy infrastructure assets.
Partnerships (particularly, limited partnerships) continue to be a popular PE vehicle, providing a means of pooling and aggregating investment funds and allowing for income or losses to be “flowed-through” to its members for Canadian tax purposes, subject to certain exceptions.
However, the use of partnerships with non-resident investors in PE investments raises two particular issues.
Part XIII of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Tax Act“), requires that … Continue Reading
The current digital age has made it easier for companies to retain an enormous volume of documents – significantly more than a company could have afforded to keep before the advent of electronic record-keeping. In response, companies have sought to upgrade their IT systems to digitize their paper records and to allow for increased storage. These upgrades, however, are inadequate without the adoption of a comprehensive formal policy to guide a company’s record-keeping process.
Why have a document retention policy?
Besides general organization purposes, there are a few other good reasons why a company should adopt a document retention policy:… Continue Reading
On July 1, amendments to the Income Tax Act (Canada) implementing international common reporting standards (CRS) will come into force. The CRS regime is intended to facilitate the exchange of taxpayer information between governments. Financial institutions will be required to report financial information about individuals and entities not resident in Canada to the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), which will in turn share the information with the tax authorities in the individual or entity’s jurisdiction of residence.
Due diligence obligations
Under CRS, financial institutions in Canada will be required to conduct due diligence on all financial … Continue Reading
In a business acquisition transaction, it is not uncommon to find an assumption by the purchaser of the obligations of the vendor to deliver goods or perform services in the future for which the vendor has already received payment. In such a scenario, there are two possible outcomes from a tax perspective, as set out below:
No election made under subsection 20(24) of the Income Tax Act
Typically the purchaser would treat the assumed obligation as part of the consideration for the purchase of the business. Where no election is made, the purchaser would not be able to deduct expenses … Continue Reading
Individuals selling their business often think of using the capital gains exemption to help keep the tax man at bay. Undoubtedly, this tax exemption is a useful tool when an individual is thinking of selling shares in their business, however, there are several conditions that must be satisfied before this exemption applies. The following is a brief overview of those conditions.
For the exemption to apply, the shares to be sold must be “qualified small business corporation shares” (as defined in the Income Tax Act (Canada)). To meet this definition, the corporation in question must be a “small business corporation”, … Continue Reading
The number one consideration for anyone buying or selling a business is price. But getting the best price is not just about the total cash value. How the purchase price is allocated across the various assets included in the deal has significant implications for the future tax liabilities of both purchasers and sellers. This article discusses some of the major considerations for purchasers and sellers in deciding how to allocate the purchase price in asset purchase agreements, and recent proposed changes to the tax treatment of goodwill which may alter the current allocation preferences of the purchaser and seller.
Inventory… Continue Reading
Non-competition agreements can be a valuable tool for purchasers who want to protect their investments in new businesses. However, non-competition agreements can have unintended and unexpected tax consequences, particularly to sellers who grant non-competition agreements to purchasers.
The Income Tax Act (Canada) (the Act) contains specific provisions regarding the taxation of “restrictive covenants”, a broadly defined term that includes, among other things, non-competition agreements, regardless of whether such agreements are legally enforceable.
Under section 56.4 of the Act, the portion of the purchase price allocated to the granting of a restrictive covenant (whether by the parties or as a … Continue Reading
In this article, we highlight joint tax elections companies should consider filing in asset purchase transactions in Canada. These elections will not only save companies time, but they will also relieve taxpayers from hassles down the road.
A GST/HST election under section 167 of the Excise Tax Act (Canada) is one of the most commonly used elections. This joint election applies to sales where a buyer receives all or substantially all of the property that is reasonably necessary for the buyer to carry on the seller’s business or part of the seller’s business. When the election applies to an asset … Continue Reading
One characteristic consequence of a share sale is, generally, that the vendor realizes a capital gain. Canadian resident shareholders are generally taxed on half of the amount of the capital gain. If available, the cumulative lifetime capital gains exemption can shelter all or a portion of the capital gain, reducing the overall tax bill of a shareholder.
The cumulative lifetime capital gains exemption entitles every individual who is a resident of Canada throughout the year to a deduction from capital gains realized on the disposition of “qualified small business corporation shares” (QSBC Shares). The deduction allowed is indexed … Continue Reading
If a non-resident vendor sells property, one consideration that a purchaser must be cognizant of is whether that property constitutes “taxable Canadian property” under the Income Tax Act (Canada). If the property is taxable Canadian property and the vendor does not obtain a certificate of compliance (discussed below), generally the purchaser must withhold 25% of the purchase price and remit it to the Receiver General of Canada.
It should be noted that even a non-resident purchaser is required to make this withholding and remittance. The purpose of these rules is to allow the Government of Canada to secure its tax … Continue Reading