Tag archives: representations

The fallacy of the fully paid share

Often I will review agreements where clients are making representations that shares are fully paid upon their issuance. This practice has developed from US law and migrated north of the border over time, but the basis for it as a concern here is rather limited, even putting it charitably. Under Canadian law, shares cannot be … Continue reading

Canada v. the US: highlights from the 2016 private deal points study

The American Bar Association recently published the 2016 Canadian Private Target M&A Deal Points Study. The study, which was authored by a group of Canadian lawyers, including several from Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, was based on a review of publicly available acquisition agreements for transactions signed in 2014 and 2015. The study provides a … Continue reading
LexBlog