Tag archives: sandbagging

Key findings: 2018 SRS Acquiom Buy-Side Representations and Warranties Insurance (RWI) Deal Terms Study

By Troy Ungerman (Toronto) on November 8, 2018 Posted in M&A

SRS Acquiom recently published its first Buy-Side Representations and Warranties Insurance (RWI) Deal Terms Study. The study analyzed the terms of 588 private-target acquisitions that closed between 2015 and 2017, the majority of which are not required to be publicly disclosed. As Canadian M&A deals continue to use RWI at an increasing pace, insights from … Continue reading

Part 3: Sandbagging in M&A – sandbagging around the world

By Troy Ungerman (Toronto) on December 7, 2017 Posted in M&A

In the past two weeks we have provided an overview of sandbagging in M&A transactions and discussed strategies that can be used when negotiating this clause. We also provided a brief overview of the consequences of remaining silent with respect to sandbagging. This week we will discuss how sandbagging clauses are used in several jurisdictions around the world. … Continue reading

Part 2: Sandbagging in M&A – is silence truly golden?

By Troy Ungerman (Toronto) on November 30, 2017 Posted in M&A

Last week we provided an overview of sandbagging in M&A transactions and outlined how buyers can mitigate their risk when an anti-sandbagging clause is included in the purchase and sale agreement. In a majority of deals, however, buyers and sellers exclude a sandbagging clause altogether, likely because they are not able to find a mutually agreeable … Continue reading

Part 1: Sandbagging in M&A – negotiating strategies

By Troy Ungerman (Toronto) on November 23, 2017 Posted in M&A

What is “sandbagging”? The concept of sandbagging is simple: one party has a strength, an advantage, or is in a position of power, which is concealed or downplayed in order to take advantage of the other party later. In the context of M&A deals, this is when the buyer learns the seller has breached a … Continue reading

2016: the year of sandbagging

By Troy Ungerman (Toronto) on January 17, 2017 Posted in M&A

One of the highlights from the American Bar Association’s (ABA) 2016 Canadian Private Target M&A Deal Points Study in which our firm was a key participant (the 2016 Study), was the increased inclusion of sandbagging provisions in deals. The 2016 Study saw the inclusion of sandbagging provisions in 46% of deals (up from 29% in … Continue reading

Protecting buyers in M&A transactions: trends in the use of indemnification provisions

By Carole Gilbert (Montreal) on June 1, 2016 Posted in Corporate finance

Allocating liability between buyers and sellers for the business and operating risks of a target company in M&A transactions is key to assessing what might be an appropriate purchase price for the transaction. As a result, the indemnification provisions in a purchase agreement are heavily negotiated with buyers seeking to limit their post-closing damages and … Continue reading