Tag archives: transaction risk

Private Equity Exits During COVID-19: What the 2008 Crisis Can Teach Us

In a previous post, we discussed the impact of COVID-19 on private equity transactions and how companies can prepare for upcoming economic changes. While opportunities for new investment are on the horizon with private equity funds presently flush with cash, movement on existing investments is likely to slow as sellers wait until markets stabilize before divesting their assets. Recent research suggests that funds with vintage years 2012 through 2017 are facing a lower exit pricing environment, which could lead fund managers to increase their holding periods and delay exiting until they can better recover their investments.

A look at … Continue Reading

Summarizing the 2018 M&A Holdback Escrow Study

One of the common tools to mitigate transaction risk is a holdback escrow, where the buyer can retrieve funds in escrow if the seller fails to meet certain terms of the purchase agreement. There are numerous benefits to holdback escrows, such as broad claim coverage, publicly-available payout statistics to assist with cost estimation, and shared risk between buyer and seller.

For practitioners curious about how best to structure holdback escrows in their deals, J.P. Morgan’s 2018 M&A Holdback Escrow Study summarizes recent holdback escrow trends by analyzing 3.5 years of its M&A transactions containing these provisions:

  • Amount in escrow: The
Continue Reading

Buyer beware: sell-side termination fees are on the rise

M&A transactions typically involve costly and time-intensive processes, and for this reason parties often seek to limit completion risk by negotiating a termination fee. Indeed, the recent 2018 SRS Acquiom Deal Terms Study reveals that the use of termination fees in private M&A transactions doubled in 2017.

From 2012 to 2016, the use of termination fees remained relatively stable, with approximately 10% of private M&A deals including termination fees.[1] In 2017, however, the use of termination fees increased dramatically, with 21% of private M&A deals reportedly incorporating termination fees.[2]

Interestingly, the overall increase in the use of termination … Continue Reading

Due diligence and risk mitigation in cross-border deals

As discussed in an earlier post, cross-border M&A deals are on the rise. Most businesses today are looking to unlock value from technology, emerging markets are flourishing and pursuing global investment opportunities and barriers to information have diminished. These are all factors giving rise to cross-border deals.

Transaction risk in cross-border deals

Cross-border deals come with many advantages, including the ability to expedite time to market, to scale and enhance brand recognition and to mitigate competition. However, cross-border deals are also accompanied by their unique set of disadvantages, making it all the more important to manage transactional risks.

Parties’ … Continue Reading

LexBlog